Rohit Sharma could not play World Cup 2011 because of Dhoni, this player was in Mahi's choice - Newztezz - Latest News Today, Breaking News, Top News Headlines, Latest Sports News

Breaking

Wednesday, August 23, 2023

Rohit Sharma could not play World Cup 2011 because of Dhoni, this player was in Mahi's choice



There was a time for Indian captain Rohit Sharma when he was struggling to make his place in the team. This is the reason why Rohit could not even play the 50 over World Cup for the Indian team in the year 2011. Hitman still regrets it a lot and now the big reason has come to the fore due to which Rohit Sharma was not selected in India's World Cup (2011) squad. Actually, Mahendra Singh Dhoni was the person because of whom Rohit Sharma's heart was broken.

Yes, that is what happened. Recently, Raja Venkat, the former selector of the Indian team, has made a big disclosure by discussing this issue. He said, 'When we sat down to select the team, Rohit was all over the plan. From 1-14 players, all were accepted when we were selecting the team. For number 15, we suggested the name of Rohit Sharma. Gary Kirsten felt it was a perfect selection, but then the captain (Mahendra Singh Dhoni) wanted a change there. Dhoni wanted to keep Piyush Chawla in the team instead of Rohit Sharma. In such a situation, immediately Gary Kirsten also changed his mind and he said - No, I think it is a better option. So this is how Rohit Sharma got out.

Significantly, Rohit Sharma is leading the Indian team, in the coming times, there will be a lot of responsibilities on the shoulders of the captain. The Indian team will be seen playing the Asia Cup from 30 September, which is going to be very important in terms of the 50-over World Cup starting from 5 October. The Indian team has been announced for the Asia Cup, so all the fans will hope that the Indian players will be seen playing fully fit and in rhythm, because there will be more changes in the team selected for the Asia Cup and the team going for the World Cup. No possibilities.

No comments:

Post a Comment